 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| CASES IN PROGRESS |
| PEZOA vs COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA, United States District Court, Northern District of California, Case No. C-05-03717-JF When was the last time you heard of somebody suing a government agency for officially segregating a workplace? Try right now. According to the EEOC determination in the case of Pezoa v. County of Santa Clara, "The evidence uncovered during the Commission's investigation establishes that Respondent segregates its psychiatric social workers on the basis of race and/or national origin. Respondent has created a 'Latino Room' for its non-Vietnamese social workers and correspondingly has a 'Vietnamese Room' for Vietnamese social workers. Respondent is not even coy about this as it even has hallway signs designating 'Latino Group' and 'Vietnamese Group.' Moreover the evidence shows that Vietnamese social workers are benefited by having lower case loads and are accorded more flexibility in work hours than non-Vietnamese. As a result of Respondent's practices, there is little communication or interaction between the various racial and ethnic groups, creating racial and ethnic tension and a hostile work environment." The supervisor who set up and enforced this arrangement and who retaliated against Ms. Pezoa when she protested these conditions was eventually prosecuted and declared a mentally disordered sex offender! Don't you feel safe and well taken care of knowing that a man supervising a California county's psychiatric social workers was a mentally disordered sex offender? It gets better--or worse: At least one member of the Board of Supervisors, the County Counsel's office, and everybody up the chain of command knew about, tolerated and are now continuing to defend this state of affairs. |
| WHAT YOU CAN DO: Write, telephone, fax, or Email the Santa Clara County Board of Supervisors and demand that Ms. Pezoa receive a public apology for the retaliation she suffered, that she be compensated for her injuries, and that the County of Santa Clara be required to adopt the principles of 2003 AB 1617 (official policy of California and National League of United Latin American Citizens) for the investigation and remediation of workplace harassment and discrimination. Board of Supervisors mailing address: County Government Center 70 West Hedding Street San Jose, CA. 95110 Supervisor Donald F. Gage - District 1 Tel: (408) 299-5010 Fax: (408) 295-6993 Email Donald Gage Supervisor Blanca Alvarado - District 2 Tel: (408) 299-5020 Fax: (408) 295-8642 Email Blanca Alvarado Supervisor Pete McHugh - District 3 Tel: (408) 299-5030 Fax: (408) 298-6637 Email Peter McHugh Supervisor James T. Beall Jr. - District 4 Tel: (408) 299-5040 Fax: (408) 299-2038 Email Jim Beall Supervisor Liz Kniss - District 5 Tel: (408)-299-5050 Fax: (408) 280-0418 Email Liz Kniss |
| IS ROCKY DELGADILLO PROSECUTING SAM SAHAB AND PRESTIGE PARKING BECAUSE HE'S IRANIAN- AMERICAN OR JUST BECAUSE HE DOESN'T CONTRIBUTE TO ROCKY'S CAMPAIGNS FOR PUBLIC OFFICE? DOWNLOAD THE FOLLOWING PDF FILE AND THEN DECIDE WHETHER THAT QUESTION IS A GOOD ONE OR NOT! CAREFULLY CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING TIMELINE:
Jan Tucker's Declaration & Court Documents from Case No. 6 CA 02508 |
| In connection with the City of Los Angeles' prosecution of Sam Sahab and Prestige Parking, J.B. Tucker & Associates sent two (2) letters to Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa, neither of which he has bothered to respond to (including but not limited to violating the California Public Records Act time deadline). The second letter, dated May 11, 2007, asks Mayor Villaraigosa to explain a campaign contribution he received from a certain very notorious convicted felon (made before the man's felony conviction). In my letter, I posed the issues as: "If you know why xxxxxxxx made this contribution, I would like you to explain it. If you don’t but know (or can find out) what persons from your campaign staff might have information regarding this contribution I would like to interview them regarding it. I am also asking that (1) you disclose to me whether you ever used xxxx's services for “opposition research,” (2) if you used him for “reverse research,” (i.e., investigating yourself in order to anticipate what a political opponent might find out), (3) whether Pellicano’s payment was by check or some other instrument that would enable him to ascertain the bank account number in which it was deposited (in the event that you were the target of one of his investigations), and (4) you make yourself available for an interview regarding this matter." The second letter speaks for itself. Download it below: CLICK HERE FOR CA PUBLIC RECORDS ACT REQUEST TO MAYOR VILLARAIGOSA |